The New York Review of Science Fiction

ISSUE #247 March 2009

ISSUE #247 March 2009

Volume 21, No. 7 ISSN #1052-9438

ESSAYS

Braulio Tavares: Camp Concentration at The Reading Gaol: 1

Brian Stableford: The Reign of the Absolute Savants: Gaston de Pawlowski’s Idealist Future History: 1

Robert von Stein Redick: Altered States: Paul Park’s Roumania Quartet and the Honoring of Complexity: 13

Tom Purdom: When I Was Writing: A Literary Memoir, Pt. 4: 17

REVIEWS

Jo Walton’s Half a Crown, reviewed by Joan Gordon: 12

Christine Cornea’s Science Fiction Cinema: Between Fantasy and Reality, reviewed by Joe Milicia: 14

Jay Lake’s Escapement, reviewed by Joe Sanders: 19

M. John Harrison’s Nova Swing, reviewed by Alex Donald: 22

PLUS

Wolfe and Kafka (7); hi-test Heinlein (16); and a new-fangled editorial (24).

 

Kathryn Cramer, Art and Web Site Editor; Samuel R. Delany, Contributing Editor; Kris Dikeman, Associate Managing Editor.

David G. Hartwell, Reviews and Features Editor; Kevin J. Maroney, Managing Editor.

Staff: Ann Crimmins, Alex Donald, Eugene Reynolds, and Eugene Surowitz.

Weekly Crew: Avram Grumer, Aubrey Lynch, Lisa Padol, and Christine Quiñones.

Special Thanks to: Arthur D. Hlavaty and Anne Zanoni.

Published monthly by Dragon Press, P.O. Box 78, Pleasantville, NY 10570.

$4.00 per copy.Annual subscriptions: U. S. Bulk Rate, $40.00; Canada, $44.00; U. S. First Class, $50.00 

Overseas Air Printed Matter, UK & Europe, $47.00; Asia & Australia, $48.00. Domestic institutional subscriptions $42.00.

Please make checks payable to Dragon Press, and payable in U.S. funds.

Electronic subscriptions are available; e-mail <[email protected]> for information.

Send all editorial inquiries and submissions to <[email protected]> and <[email protected]>. 

An up-to-date index of back issues in Excel format is available; e-mail <[email protected]> to request one.

New York Review of Science Fiction Home Page: www.nyrsf.com

Copyright © 2009 Dragon Press.

And now the news

From NYRSF ISSUE #247, March 2009

I refer of course to the classic sf story by Theodore Sturgeon. Any of you who do not see its relevance to the present state of the world and sf need to go back and read it soon. It is an idea of Robert A. Heinlein’s, set to the musical language of Sturgeon, and at the center of the question of prolepsis in sf.

It is now a plausible scenario that all the professional printed sf magazines in the U.S. will cease publication this year—along with many other magazines. The circulation figures for sf publications as printed in the Locus summary show dire progressions downward for all magazines in 2008—and Realms of Fantasy will cease publication as of April 2009. As I write, there are conflicting reports that fifty percent of the magazine distribution in the US is about to cease business—some reports say it has in fact happened, some deny it. What is certain is that there is a per-copy surcharge just levied on all magazines by two huge distributors, and that some big magazines, such as Time and People, are refusing to pay it. What is also uncertain is how this will affect the distribution of mass market books in the US—mass market books are distributed to non-bookstore locations by magazine distributors, who put the books into airports, supermarkets, and Wal-Mart stores, for instance. But these are only five percent of the distributors’ business. The Trumps of Doom interpretation for sf is that it will bring about a short-term cascade of returns on all titles from the distributors, and then decrease the already decreasing distribution of all sf and fantasy, forcing nearly all smaller books into unprofitability. The end result of that scenario would be a sharp, sudden decrease in the number of mass-market paperback titles published by the end of 2009 and a concomitant increase in pressure to publish more titles in trade paperback. I don’t even want to speculate at this point on what it might mean for electronic publication, which is just beginning to show some noticeable profitability. Let us consider this all a dystopian sf scenario for the moment, and we will report back next month.

I had hoped to devote this editorial entirely to John Updike, but a condensed version will have to do. Updike was one of the principal arbiters of literary taste in the U.S., a writer of extraordinary talent, and, like Edmund Wilson, a fine book reviewer, principally for The New Yorker. Like W. H. Auden in the generation before him, he was interested in science as well as literature, and Updike was the single most influential force in establishing the literary acceptability of Ursula K. Le Guin in the mainstream in the US. He uttered an authoritative marginalization of science fiction as a whole in his New Yorker review of my own A World Treasury of Science Fiction—in part authoritative because it came from a selective sympathizer. He set up his discussion with what he called the crucial question: “What keeps science fiction a minor genre, for all the brilliance of its authors and apparent pertinence of its concerns?” His answer I always found unsatisfactory: “Each science fiction story is so busy inventing its environment that little energy is invested in the human subtleties.” My short version response is that this is fairly clearly a restatement of the Modernist position that good literature is solely about the inner life of characters in ordinary situations. Science fiction is general does not attempt that but excels at the behavior of characters in unusual and at best entirely plausible invented settings. I invite our readers to comment.

—David G. Hartwell

& the editors